Who plans, who executes

How Google's Gemini 4 Hydrogen splits agent work between models, and who is accountable when one plans and another executes.

Google released Gemini 4 Hydrogen yesterday, a fast and cheaper model for the hands-on work of agents: writing code, running tests, checking whether a change is correct. Google leaves the heavy reasoning to its larger models, Carbon and Argon.

Alongside it comes Orchestrator in Antigravity, which switches between models within a single session. According to Google, on Terminal-Bench 4.0 this achieves almost the same success rate as Carbon on its own, with 24 percent lower usage on average. For parallel work, Carbon can coordinate while Hydrogen directs builders and reviewers, each in its own workspace. The price: 1.50 dollars per million input tokens.

All figures come from Google itself. Independent tests are still to come.

It looks more and more like a team: one that plans and reviews, many that carry out the work. That raises a question we already know from people. If one model plans and another executes, who answers for the result?

More episodes

All episodes
Nov 12, 2026 · In Dutch
What you prove

How AI agents formally proved key properties of the Signal protocol in four weeks, and why choosing what to prove now matters most.

Nov 10, 2026 · In Dutch
Don't ask again

How Claude Code's "don't ask again" option can save passwords and keys in a project file that ends up public on GitHub.

Nov 9, 2026 · In Dutch
Practice world

How world models copy real spaces so robots and self-driving cars can train there, and who supplies the footage they learn from.

Nov 8, 2026 · In Dutch
Who keeps track

How AI caregiving apps take on paperwork, while keeping records current and trusting the privacy promise still falls to families.